Status: community draft, not a standard. We are not a certification body, and a score against this list certifies nothing. It is a structured way to start a conversation that mostly isn't happening.
Every week another AI agent platform ships. Almost none of them can read a building. That asymmetry is the strangest gap in the agent ecosystem right now.
Somewhere in a hospital, a CO2 sensor reports under the name quality_zone_1 . Three floors up, an identical sensor installed by a different subcontractor reports as AIR_QUAL_ZN_01 . Higher still, a third crew named theirs AQ-1 .
Ask twelve building-software vendors whether their platforms are open and you will get twelve yeses. This report card asks a narrower question: what does the public evidence support?
The honest version, with estimates labeled as estimates. Pull the point list from any two office buildings and compare. One calls a supply-air temperature sensor AHU-3-SAT. The next calls the same physical thing SF03_DA_TMP.
Certification-rich, interoperability-poor: to our knowledge, the first building-data interoperability assessment written specifically for Asia-Pacific.